🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts said the seeming leak could aid AI companies looking for material to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the breached music would likely be utilized for training AI models.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a vast online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own private free version of the service”. He added it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.